⚛️ Historic Experiment · 1909 · Geiger & Marsden

Rutherford's Gold Foil
Experiment

Fire alpha particles at gold foil and watch history unfold in cinematic slow motion. Discover the nuclear model of the atom — exactly as Rutherford did — one observation at a time.

⚛️ Nuclear Physics
📐 FYUGP Physics
🎬 Slow-Mo Simulation
🔬 Interactive Variables
📜 Historical Context
1 · Setup
2 · Firing
3 · Observation
4 · Examine Screen
5 · Conclusions
Experiment Setup
Particle Type
Foil Material
Foil Thickness 1× (standard)
Particle Energy 5.5 MeV (standard)
Fire Rate Normal
📦 Lead Box Source
⬛ Gold Foil
🟢 ZnS Screen
🔬 Close Examination · ZnS Fluorescent Screen

What the Screen Reveals

ZnS Zinc Sulphide Detector Screen

Analysing flash pattern…

The flashes of light on the ZnS screen tell a remarkable story.

Ready — configure your setup and fire.
⚛️ What Rutherford Concluded

From these three simple observations, Rutherford overturned the Thomson "plum pudding" model and proposed the nuclear atom in 1911.

1
The atom is mostly empty space

Since ~98.5% of particles pass straight through, the atom cannot be a solid sphere. The positive charge and mass are not spread uniformly — they must be concentrated elsewhere.

2
There is a tiny, dense, positively charged nucleus at the centre

The backscattering (~0.1%) is only possible if there is an extremely concentrated region of positive charge and mass at the atom's centre — the nucleus. Its diameter is ~10⁻¹⁵ m, while the atom is ~10⁻¹⁰ m across.

3
Electrons occupy the vast surrounding space

The nearly massless electrons orbit at large distances from the nucleus, making the atom mostly empty. They contribute negligible deflection to the heavy alpha particles.

4
Scattering follows Coulomb's Law

The angle of deflection depends on the distance of closest approach (impact parameter b). Particles passing close to the nucleus experience stronger Coulomb repulsion: cot(θ/2) = 4πε₀ · m·v²·b / 2Ze²

🎛️ What Happens When You Change Variables?

Try the controls above — here's the real physics behind each change.

α Alpha Particle (He²⁺)
Standard result — most pass, few scatter, very few backscatter

Alpha particles (charge +2, mass 4u) are heavy enough to show clear scattering statistics. The Coulomb force between α and nucleus causes measurable deflection. This is the original Rutherford setup.

🥇
Gold Foil (Z = 79)
High Z → strong Coulomb force → more scattering

Gold has atomic number Z=79 — a highly charged, heavy nucleus. The strong Coulomb repulsion produces a clear scattering pattern. Gold is also very malleable, allowing extremely thin foils (≈1000 atoms thick).

📏
Foil Thickness: 1× (Standard)
Thicker foil → more scattering events total

Increasing thickness means more nuclear layers. More chance of interaction per particle. Back-scatter rate increases proportionally with thickness. However, too thick and particles lose too much energy before scattering.

Energy: 5.5 MeV (Standard)
Higher energy → less deflection at same impact parameter

Higher kinetic energy means the particle spends less time near the nucleus. Coulomb force has less time to act. The distance of closest approach decreases: d = Ze²/(4πε₀·KE). More energetic particles get closer before being repelled.

📚 Physics Behind the Experiment

Key concepts and formulae for your FYUGP examination.

The Rutherford Scattering Formula

dσ/dΩ = (Z₁Z₂e²/4E)² · 1/sin⁴(θ/2)

The differential cross-section. Z₁=2 (alpha), Z₂=79 (gold), E=kinetic energy, θ=scattering angle. Predicts the fraction of particles scattered into each angular range.

Distance of Closest Approach

d = Z₁Z₂e² / (4πε₀ · KE)

For a head-on collision. For 5.5 MeV alpha on gold: d ≈ 42 fm. This sets an upper bound on the nuclear radius. The actual nucleus is much smaller (~7 fm for gold).

Impact Parameter & Deflection

cot(θ/2) = 4πε₀ · mv²b / 2Z₂e²

b = impact parameter (perpendicular distance from nucleus to particle path). Small b → large θ (backscattering). Large b → small θ (grazing, slight deflection). b → ∞ → θ → 0 (no deflection).

Experimental Setup — 1909

  • Source: Radon-222 in lead box
  • Foil: Gold, ~400 nm thick (1000 atoms)
  • Detector: ZnS screen (zinc sulphide)
  • Lab: Geiger & Marsden (Manchester)
  • Result: ~1 in 8000 particles backscattered
  • Conclusion: Nuclear model, 1911

Why Thomson's Model Failed

J.J. Thomson's "plum pudding" model (1904) imagined a diffuse, uniform positive charge with electrons embedded. If this were true, the maximum deflection for any alpha particle would be <1° — no backscattering possible. Rutherford's experiment definitively disproved this.

Historical Significance

This experiment in 1909–1911 is considered one of the most important in physics. It established that:

  • The atom is 99.999% empty space
  • Nuclear radius ≈ 10⁻¹⁵ m (1 fm)
  • Atomic radius ≈ 10⁻¹⁰ m (1 Å)
  • Nuclei contain protons (Rutherford, 1919)